Saturday, October 24th 2009 - 350.org

October 22nd, 2009

What is 350.org?

350 represents what a community of leading scientists call the safe upper limit of CO2 in our atmosphere (measured in parts per million)

The number 350 is based on a peer-reviewed abstract released in January 2008, recognizing the parts per million impact on global climate change.

Our current level - 390 parts per million and rising …

350.org is sponsoring a number of events - 4,517 across 173 countries to be exact - that bring awareness to this number in an International Day of Climate Action.

This video helps to explain a bit more … The Colbert Report with 350.org Founder

Join us in Palo Alto on Saturday to help raise awareness and “lower the bar” so to speak … Our Event

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

DIY solar water heating tip#1: Glycol Lines

October 22nd, 2009

sheathing-lines2

Okay – I know that many people out there are like me and prefer to do things themselves and take unique pride in the sweat equity of a great home improvement project. And I know that there are many more people out there who would see a solar water heating installation as an opportunity to bear down, get dirty, and start saving some home energy. Unfortunately, most people simply don’t have the experience to pull off a world-class solar water heating installation despite the greatest intentions… The man or woman that coined the phrase “The devil is in the details” might have been a solar water heating installer.

Now it might seem foolish to divulge these hard-earned tricks of the trade here, in our blog, but in the spirit of progress, we here at PolarSolar want to help those along through the not-so-simple pleasures of mounting, sealing, plumbing, flashing, running, insulating, charging, troubleshooting, and fixing of solar water heating systems. So in no particular order…

Exterior Glycol Lines: Cover Them!

Exposed glycol carrying lines should have a metal cover: We custom fabricate metal sheathing to run our lines in and we paint them to match the roof color or building color if run along the exterior or otherwise visible from the street. Why? The first reason is that the painted armaflex will degrade – split, crack, and pock up - end up looking like something for Halloween and it will not do its job of insulating that hot glycol. The second reason is that it keeps birds and other animals from picking at it, eating it, and using it for nesting material.

Another point about the line runs is that they should be slightly elevated to allow runoff and avoid catching leaves and other debris that can build up over time and become a fire hazard.

So cover and elevate those lines!!!

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

The Green Home Center

October 14th, 2009

The following graph represents CO2 pollution in the average home as compared to the average car (the average car getting 21 mpg, and the average American household of 3.3 people). An important note to make is that this does not include CO2 that was generated offsite (i.e. emissions from electricity generation). This paints a candid picture of what is happening in homes all across the country. We have done a good job of pointing out the need for a better fuel economy on the road, but we would argue that more can be done to bring awareness to the carbon emissions given off each day at home. In other words … we are paying a lot of attention to the pollution on the left, and very little to that on the right.

Homes emit more CO2 than cars do!!!!!

Homes emit more CO2 than cars do!!!!!

The Green Home Center started with Dietmar Brand’s vision … to create a sustainable and healthy living space that honors our natural environment. Visit The Green Home Center and you will find everything under the sun when it comes to alternative, affordable and sustainable choices you can make in the home. Dietmar is a visionary and infuses passion in his work - and it shows. If you would like to be kept up to date on events being held at the Center - everything from vegetarian cooking classes to organic wine tasting to creating natural body/facial scrubs and washes from natural foods found in the supermarket, feel free to join the newsletter.

PolarSolar is very happy to have joined San Francisco’s Green Home Center as ours is a common vision - to empower people to create sustainable and healthy living spaces that reduce our carbon footprint and increase our positive contribution to the community. Dietmar says it best … “It is your life and your home … live well.”

San Francisco Green Home Center

Brand Kitchens at SF's Green Home Center

green-home-center-logo

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

This Old House Goes Solar Thermal

October 4th, 2009

Alan and Toby Cooper of Palo Alto are now the proud owners of a top-of-the-line solar hot water system. The installation is a dual-tank system with a natural gas backup. The installation was straightforward and came off without a hitch thanks to careful preparation and planning.

The house was built around 1910 (all redwood construction). Roof penetrations are very important - all homeowners are especially concerned about this as they should be, so a few comments on best practices with regard to roofing and penetrations: YOU CANNOT RELY ON CHEMICALS FOR SEALANT. A chemical waterproofing must be used in conjunction with a physical/structural sealing to go “above and beyond” certainty that the roof penetrations will not leak. On this sloped roof, we flush mounted the brackets by lagging stainless steel bolts through matching washers directly into the rafter and finish the penetrations using a DAP 3D sealant and Henry’s 209 cold tar. The bolt/washer combination provides structural waterproofing while the 3d and cold tar provides an added chemical seal. Additionally, proper flashing is used to direct runoff away from the penetrations.

Before Solar Collectors

Before Solar Collectors

Flat Plate Collectors Mounted

Flat Plate Collectors Mounted

PolarSolar installs a Dual Tank Solar Water System

PolarSolar's work is DONE

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Flat Plate Collectors versus Evacuated Tubes

October 3rd, 2009

Home Power Magazine for August/September 2009 had a great article on this. We get this question a lot so Im going to post the response that we just recently gave that explains basically that climate context is key here…

“The ‘devil is in the details’ as well with regard to collectors. Evacuated tube collectors function ideally in very cold / low light climates and in certain industrial applications. They do achieve higher temperatures inside the tubes. However, these higher temperatures pose problems in applications in our climate (California). “Home Power” actually just featured an article comparing the efficiencies of flat plate and evacuated tube collectors and found that the efficiency of the flat plates with selective absorption coating is much higher in our operating temperature range (see the attached graph from “Home Power August/September 2009”).

Flat Plates Collectors Win

Flat Plates Collectors Win


My main concern with evacuated tube collectors for domestic hot water locally is the overheating issue. It would seem that going with an evacuated tube system would be a good solution for having less than 100% ideal orientation, but the reality is that we end up “hunting rabbit with buck shot” and causing problems: These collectors will overheat and go into “stagnation” many, many times. With the collector you specified, we would be relying on the “snap-disk” system to hold up and manage the overheating of the system many times over, and the heat transfer fluid in the system would degrade faster as well. This issue itself really compromises efficiency and cost-effectiveness…”

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Results Are In!

September 8th, 2009

Hi Guys,
I Just got my utility bill for the first month of full solar operation.  Gas consumption was 0.07 therms / day ($0.29), as compared to a summer monthly average of approximately 0.75 therms/day ($1.40).  Why, you might ask, did the cost not go down by 10X like the usage?  There’s a flat monthly customer charge of $5.30 for service, which accounted for the bulk of our $8.12 gas bill.  As predicted, virtually all the gas we were using in the summer was for heating hot water.

It’s not quite the whole story, since we were away for 10 days on vacation.  We probably would have used 0.10 therms/day.  But it still looks like we’ll save on average a buck a day, as long as the sun keeps shining.

Other interesting facts: average family usage in the summer in Palo Alto is 30 therms / month.  So we started at about 75% of normal usage.  Then again, we’re about 75% of the size of the average family.  A therm, in case you’re wondering, is 100,000 BTU and will heat 160 gallons of water to approximately 130 degrees.  Amazing what you can learn from your utility bill.

The system is working perfectly. Hope you’re installing a bunch of systems.  I was walking around midtown Palo Alto and looking at the rows of nearly-identical ranch houses with their unshaded, south-facing, 20 degree asphalt shingle roofs and thinking “That’s a good one…and that one…that one too…”  Now I’m obsessed!

See you,
John S.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Why It’s Time to Change

September 7th, 2009

Take a look around. No really, just look around. Maybe half of the objects around you run on some form of energy. It’s vital to our entire lifestyle. Of course, centuries ago, we were not so dependent on energy. But times have changed, and we must be able to change with them. We can no longer deny this new dependence on energy. What would we do without electricity for computers? Without fuel for cars? Without refrigerators?

Energy doesn’t come out of thin air. We would like to think that energy simply comes out of the electrical outlet. We would like to think that “behind those three small holes in the wall there is a huge, unlimited amount of energy bubbling around.” But it’s not true. It’s not there. And anyway, energy doesn’t even bubble.

As every year passes by, our global needs for energy increase. Our energy sources, however, are not growing as well. Time is running out. Every single day, gasoline is used and pollutes the atmosphere. Every single hour, a factory throws carbon into the air. Every second, pollution is destroying the only planet we have to live on. Our problem is given to us: We are dependent on energy. Our solution, however, had to be found.

The problem increases day by day. The longer we wait, the harder it will be to stop this growing problem. We can no longer wait for someone else to take a step forward. We have to be the ones to take a risk. Why not? Who says that we are too young or too old to change the world? We can be the ones to lead the rest of the world out of its energy problem. There is a solution out there. It’s called solar water heating.

Solar water heating is the most environmentally impactful investment you can make. Natural gas litters the environment with CO2, and according to PG&E, solar water heating can save more natural gas than any other home improvement. If you could save energy, money, and the environment at the same time, you’d do it. Now ask yourself…Why not? VS.

graph2

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Hail in Yonkers

July 13th, 2009

The solar water collectors at the Consumer Reports Facility in Yonkers, New York took a beating last week, but stood strong despite a fierce hail storm.  The collectors are engineered to withstand extremely harsh conditions. The Consumer Reports’ first test results of the system will come out in the October issue.

http://blogs.consumerreports.org/home/2009/07/best-solar-water-heaters-consumer-reports-ratings-review-energy-efficiency.html

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Solar Hot Water: Works Well

June 19th, 2009

Solar hot water: works well.

We’ve had our solar hot water system fully operational at our house for two days now, and so far it has been working extremely well.  As expected, it has provided plenty of hot water for our family of three without the need for any additional auxiliary heating.  So, not only do I get a hot shower in the morning, I get the pleasant sense of not totally screwing up the environment.

I had a hard time finding good information about solar hot water on the web - there’s a lot of marketing fluff from the manufacturers, and general theory, but not much data on what the systems are really like from the user’s perspective.  I’ve learned a lot over the last couple of days from watching the installation and using the system, so I thought I’d share my observations.  I’m no mechanical engineer, so a lot of what follows is just my unschooled analysis of what I’ve learned and heard about.  Rely on my conjectures at your own risk!

The Collectors

The collectors are a pair of 4′x6′ panels that mount on the roof.  The roof on our house tilts 20 degrees toward the south and is completely unshaded, so it’s really perfect for a solar installation.  The only drawback is that it’s covered with terra cotta tiles, which require a little extra work when installing the panels.  You have to install some curved brackets that fit under the tiles to support the panels, and you wind up breaking and repairing a few, so there’s some fiddling around. The panels themselves are slim (about 4″ thick) black aluminum frames, covered with anti-reflective glass (actually, shatterproof acrylic, I think).  If you peer into them in bright sunlight, you can see an internal sheet of copper, tinted midnight blue, that captures the solar energy.  Soldered to the copper sheet is a serpentine pipe that carries the heat exchange fluid.

This arrangement creates the mother of all greenhouse effects.  The controller (more on that in a minute) reports the internal temperature of the panels.  Yesterday, June 18 (nearly the solstice!), which was cool and partly overcast, the panels reached a maximum temperature of 225 degrees F.  Palo Alto is at 37 degrees north latitude.  That’s hot enough not only to fry an egg (or boil water), but also to cook a few slices of bacon to go with it.  All that energy capture translated into heating up 80 gallons of water in our tank to 155 degrees F.

Seybold's Schuco Collectors Installed by PolarSolar
The Tank

It turns out that the humble tank, which you might naively think of as not that important, actually has a huge effect on the efficiency and performance of the system.  There are two basic layouts: you can use a solar storage tank that gets warmed by the sun and feeds preheated water to your regular gas fired water heater, reducing the amount of work it needs to do.  Or, as we did, you can use a single solar heated tank with an auxiliary 220V electric heating element.  Mostly we chose the second option for space reasons, but it also turns out to be more energy efficient.  The only drawback is that there’s a little less capacity (or so I hear).  But an 80 gallon tank like we have is apparently more than enough at least for our three person family.  The electric heating works fine - we had to use the tank in electric-only mode for a couple of days before the collectors got hooked up, and it was OK.

Why is the tank so important?  And why is the single tank approach more efficient?  Well, it turns out that there is a huge temperature gradient inside a hot water tank.  The top will be at, say, 120 degrees, which is a normally usable temperature.  Water at the bottom will be at 80 - 90 degrees.  How you handle that temperature differential has a big impact on the efficiency of the system.  All water heaters deliver hot water out of the top of tank, and pull in cold water into the bottom.  But that’s not the whole story.

A regular gas water heater handles that gradient really badly.  It heats the water at the bottom using a gas burner, which is the least efficient thing you can do (although I believe there may be new, energy efficient gas heaters that work differently).   Effectively you’re putting all your energy into heating water that’s the coldest and least likely to be used.  The electric element in the Schuco tank, on the other hand, is located at the top.  That means that when auxiliary heating is needed, only a relatively small amount of water needs to be warmed to deliver usable temperatures.  You don’t care if the water at the bottom is at 80 degrees, as long as what’s coming out the top is hot enough.

The solar tank also has a heat exchanger located near the bottom of the tank.  A small pump circulates propylene glycol up through the solar panels, back down at high temperature into the top of the heat exchanger (near the midline of the tank), then down through the heat exchanger where it warms up the water, and out the bottom of the tank where it can be pumped back up into the panels again.  The solar system is also heating water at the bottom of the tank, but that’s actually an advantage, at least when the heat is free and plentiful.  You want to capture as much heat during the day as you can, so that it’s still hot the next morning for your shower.  You can only get the water so hot before the tank gets damaged (about 170 degrees), so you want to eliminate the temperature gradient as much as you can to store the maximum amount of energy within the allowable operating range of the system.  By the way, nothing disastrous happens at 170 degrees - its just that the lining of the tank doesn’t last as long.  So the controller is set up to shut down the panels once the temperature reaches that high.  It’s clear that you could, on a really hot sunny day, capture enough energy to boil the water in the tank, and that’s something that you really, really don’t want to do.

The other key thing about the tank is the insulation.  You don’t get any heat at night, so it need to be able to store enough heat overnight for morning use.  This works fine - water at 155 degrees at 6 pm was still at about 125 degrees at 8 am the next morning.  This is also a place where the single tank solution is better, since you only have one tank bleeding heat.

The Controller

The controller monitors the temperature at the top and bottom of the tank and the temperature of the solar panels, and turns on and off the pump as appropriate.  I mentioned the temperature limits: the controller has a “stagnation mode” that it uses if the tank gets too hot, where it drains the fluid out of the solar panels and into an expansion tank, stopping any further heat capture.  The controller is quite nice - I haven’t read the manual yet, but it gives out lots of information about the temperatures it is observing and the activity of the system.  Since I’ve become a hot water nerd, I find myself drifting out to the garage a few times a day to observe, with a quiet sense of satisfaction, the action of the sun heating up our water.  I’m hoping I can get over it soon.  The controller also turns the electric element on if needed to maintain the output temperature.  It has logic (which I think is adjustable) to decide if it can wait a little bit–I believe the default is 30 minutes–if the panels are coming up to temperature and it could avoid using electricity.  Here’s where you get to be extra-green: taking the risk of slightly cooler shower to save some electrons.  I’m not sure I’m that green - I have the mode enabled, but we’ll see how it goes.  Hey, we’re buying renewable power anyway (it’s an option in Palo Alto).

The Plumbing

It would all be pretty simple if it wasn’t for our recirculation pump.  We’re using a wirelessly activated recirc pump, triggered by buttons at the faucets, to circulate hot water through a loop to all our faucets.  You hit the button, wait a few seconds, and you have hot water almost instantly with very little waste.  This gets a little tricky because it has to be plumbed together with an anti-scald valve.  Remember, you could serve 170 degree water out of the tank, so you need a device that mixes in some cold water to moderate the temperature to something you could put on your skin without getting seriously burned.  It’s a little tricky to plumb all this together.  If I get inspired, I’ll write up a separate entry later about how this works.  Here’s the problem: you have a closed loop connected to the water heater, and yet you need to inject cold water when you recirculate.  How are you going to do that?  You can’t compress water, can you?  Solve that puzzle if you can!  Hint - you can use cold water from the recirc loop OR cold water from the input line…

The pipes carrying the heat transfer fluid come together at the solar tank, where they tie into the controller.  There’s an insulated box with three analog dial gauges, showing the temperature of the fluid leaving the tank (cool) and returning from the collectors (hot) and the pressure of the heat transfer fluid.  It looks kind of cool.

Conclusion

The system is really beautiful.  All the components seem to be of the highest quality, and so far it all seems to be working extremely well.  We’ll see how it holds up over time, but since the pump is the only moving part, I imagine that it will work well for years.  You know how you look at the way something is designed and manufactured and you can just tell that it’s good, well-thought-out equipment?  That’s my impression, for sure.  Anyway, based on my experience so far, I would highly recommend solar hot water to other people.  I mean, it’s such a no-brainer: save as much carbon emissions each year as you would by not driving, get free hot water for ever, enjoy the same lifestyle, and all for a pretty small capital investment (for us, less than $5000 after incentives).

- John Seybold, Palo Alto

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

The Passive Home

June 9th, 2009

John McIlwain wrote recently of the shift toward smaller, more energy efficient cars in the face of rising fuel prices in the US and how American homes are next. Though the homebuilding market has never been as sensitive to similar trends given the conservatism of the homebuilding industry and the concern of homebuyers for the resale value of their homes, there is a very good argument to be made that the European “passive home” could be the next “Prius” in the US market.

Passive homes were introduced in Germany and other Scandinavian countries in the early nineties. They are typified by

  • Thick walls with heavy insulation, triple-paned windows, and special airtight doors;
  • Airtight living spaces with no thermo-dynamic leakage;
  • Special air and ventilation systems that control humidity, air circulation, and a heat exchanger that captures over 90 percent of the internal heat from the outgoing air to warm incoming air;
  • Windows sized appropriately to their orientations; and
  • Reduced external surfaces

These homes are generally smaller than most American homes (500 sq. ft. per person) and are reported to cost 5 to 7 percent more than conventional European construction. However, the operating costs are FAR lower than homes built even to American Energy Star or other green standards. Presumably, smaller homebuilders will be the ones to take the initial risk of building and marketing these homes- after recognizing the demand from a few early-adopting, visionary homeowners-to-be. As this begins to happen, PolarSolar is here with expertise in these features. Aside from the solar water heating technology necessary to reach the net zero emission standard, we can also offer consulting and installation support across a variety of other passive home elements such as vinyl windows, insulation, and weatherized doors…JW

Passive Home

Passive Home

  • Share/Save/Bookmark